IllustrationsFigure 1. Nikola Tesla.Figure 2. Mark Twain in Tesla's laboratory. Figure 3. Tom Bearden. Figure 4. Michael Tellinger in his Adam's Calendar video. Figure 5. The formula for lifeas posited in Scientology 8-80. Figure 6. Billy Meier. Figure 7. Jordan Maxwell with George Green. Figure 8. David Wilcock. |
Outline of Findings of Alternative SciencesIntroductionThe To over-simplify, the new science is basicaly the science of gravity.
Gravity is what holds matter, and thus the entire universe, together.
What understanding gravity gives us is the ability to control how Traditional science tries to separate things - to break them apart so they can be analyzed. It sees the force holding things together as just an obstacle. The alternative sciences attempt to study and control that force. In the thetan-mind-body paradigm, all matter and energy is created by life. If life were still consciously and continuously creating the universe, existence as we are used to it would become much less predictable. The alternative sciences explore such a world, yet generally do not ascribe its unpredictability to living causes. In such a world, time can flow both forward and backward, and at different speeds. Matter can be un-created as easily as it can be created. Gravity can be defied as easily as it can be agreed with. Such phenomena are traditionally thought of as the result of exerting paranormal powers. The alternative sciences seek mechanistic ways to exert this type of control. To the extent that the new science fails to use paranormal research, I think it will fall short of developing workable technologies. And I think that the control structure on this planet wants to maintain that separateness, as it has done with the traditional sciences. It has been determined by others that extraterrestrial societies are successfully using such technologies. Yet there seems to be some nervousness on their part about their own use of them, and certainly about our use of them. Is it possible to go too far with these technologies? Could you cause some domino effect that would gradually - or suddenly - cause the universe or some portion of it to, say, disappear? I know that in Scientology this is not a concern. By proposing
a completely spiritual approach to the problem, no mechanistic construct
is introduced between the being and the effect it wishes to create.
Thus each effect created is the total responsibility of the being who creates it
and in theory could have no great effect on others unless they were to
completely agree with it. This limits the scope of these effects to what seems
to me safe and manageable.
If you introduce machine-assisted spiritual abilities there is a possiblity,
I suppose, of magnifying the effect far beyond the scope intended.
Effects could be created that the being operating the machine might be unable,
or unwilling, to take full responsibility for.
From this viewpoint I can understand the ET hesitation in releasing
such technology in machine form to a society like ours.
This emphasizes the common observation that access to this technology
requires a degree of spiritual development. Even the Resources - Human DataTeslaTesla is a huge subject on the web. There are so many Tesla-related sites. One of them is 21st Century Books. They carry a pdf of Tesla's autobiographical magazine articles, and lots of other resources. I believe they link to most of the alternative science sites, but here are some in particular: Tom BeardenTom maintains an extensive site on the subject of advanced scalar physics and
the theory behind Michael TellingerMichael is mentioned more thoroughly under Paranormal Studies. But he has a science background and his books contain a lot of science. His approach to learning more about human history is basically archaeological. He has been on the track of evidence to support the stories told on the old Sumerian clay cylinders that have been translated by Zecharia Sitchin and others. Though he has other diverse interests, his books and web sites are mostly centered on his ancient history studies. Scientology 8-80This is the basic book on Scientology-style physics. It deserves mention here because I have studied it and because it extends physics theory all the way back to its source. It does not go deeply into higher math or multiple dimensions. LRH did not consider that it was necessary for an auditor to understand these things. The theory in this book does underlie many auditing processes. Resources - Secret ProjectsGeneralSecret government projects proliferated after the Project CamelotAs with Paranormal Research, I recommend this site as a starting place for
any subject not well covered by conventional sources in the area of research
and technologies that could be or are affecting basic human rights and freedoms.
Their philosophical foundation is not extensive, but they express a Resources - ET DataGeneralSome people believe that ET data on science, physics and spirituality are unreliable because of the true ET purposes here. I think this argument has some merit. Again, Project Camelot is a great place to start. Major contributors to the internet documentation on this subject are listed below. Billy MeierBilly is one of the older ET contact personalities. He is Swiss and lives in Switzerland. His most voluminous contacts started in 1975. He typed them out in German, so they had to be translated before they could be reported here in the US. This was initially done by Colonel Wendelle Stevens, has been continued by volunteers connected with web sites like TheyFly.com, and is carried on today by members of FIGU under Billy's oversight. George GreenGeorge was also mixed up in the Billy Meier story, but comes from a different background. He now says he has his own ET sources. They are connected to Billy's sources. David WilcockDavid has widely studied the alternative sciences and uses them liberally in his writings and presentations. He emphasizes the potential spiritual benefits of communicating with ETs. He also has his own contacts. Other ContacteesOther people who speak and write about the ETs, their teachings and technologies, based on various types of contacts include: Miriam Delicado, Alex Collier, Jordan Maxwell, Phillip Krapf (the Verdants), Richard Boylan, Charles Hall and Alec Newald. There are many others that I could also list. See Project Camelot. The only problem with Camelot is that it does not categorize the people it interviews. Some of them are researchers, some of them are government insiders (current or former), some of them are contactees, and some of them are combinations of two or more. George LuBuonoDr. LuBuono has written a downloadable book based on data from many of the above people as well as his own remote sensing work. It is called The Alien Mind. He is deeply into hyper-dimensions and the politics of the situation. He works on the scientific side of things and does not get into the spiritual aspects of it all very much. He believes that the Earth is being looked at by various ETs as a resource to either be exploited or protected. He asserts that we (the people of Earth) still have a lot to say about how this struggle resolves. His book is dense but interesting. It was written fairly recently (2006). Marshall Vian SummersMV Summers speaks for a group of ETs who are watching over Earth but not directly interfering. They call themselves the Alliance for Humanity. They take a pragmatic but spiritual approach to the situation. They use concepts very similar to Scientology basics. All communication between humans and the Alliance is done telepathically. These contacts are also quite recent. Summers has proposed a Declaration of Human Sovereignty and has written other documents that attempt to warn us of the invasive aspects of what the ETs are doing here. Many other serious reporters echo his concerns. Outline of Findings of Alternative Sciences |